Despite the very apparent appeal of Paris to expanding retail brands, London scored better overall on our Retail Destination Index.
London’s higher score, while largely determined by its underlying operational fundamentals related to retail spend and tourist flows, was enhanced by its ‘opportunity’ potential and lower total occupational costs.
Savills has devised a relatively simple measure of retailer ‘opportunity’. This is based on the total number of standalone stores the top 10 global fashion brands/groups (based on global turnover) have in the city relative to population and visitor numbers.
Based on this measure London would appear relatively under supplied compared to Paris with 13.1 stores per 1 million of population and 3.9 per 1 million of international tourists. This compares to 17.3 and 5.9 respectively in Paris. For international brands looking to expand, this suggests the level of competition may be less pronounced in London, albeit this will be largely dependent on the nature of their product offer and existing competition.
London also outperformed Paris in terms of prime total occupational costs, with an indicative cost of €21,700 per sqm per annum, 6.7% lower than Paris. The revenue potential of London and its lower occupational costs suggests the profit margin offered by a London store may be greater than that of a similar store in Paris. This will enhance its appeal to new international entrants, hence its place at the top of our Retail Destination Index.