The decision to leave the EU will cause many to question whether London can retain its pre-eminence as a world city. Out of the other European cities, Paris is closest in terms of its connectedness, performance, power and global competitiveness, but even the City of Lights lags someway behind the Big Smoke given its employment laws.
Prime markets in gateway cities across the globe have been honeypots for international investors not only in London but also in New York, Singapore and Hong Kong, for example. Prime real estate markets in these ‘alpha cities’ are closely linked to wider business location preferences and investment preferences, reflecting the success and prominence of the cities on the global stage.
Where ready finance, rule of law, transparent markets and good title are available, real estate attracts global investment, not only because of its growth prospects and income producing capability but also as a store of wealth in a safe-haven jurisdiction.
Real estate also has the advantage over, say, gold by being a usable utility. The purchase of residential real estate is therefore linked to the number of visitors, business and investment transactions in a city. This means that the fundamental global attractions of a city will always have a major impact on its real estate markets.
In this regard, London scores very high on the world stage, just beating New York in Savills composite world city scoring system. Both these cities score significantly above the next rivals by this measure, Paris and Tokyo.
The unique combination of London’s social and environmental quality, as well as its size and economic prowess, means that the demand fundamentals for its real estate should remain strong through economic cycles and post-brexit wobbles.
