This year we have seen buyers moving from London to a commuter location account for 26% of sales, compared to just 21% in 2013.
This change comes as the price differential between the capital and the rest of the UK reaches an all time high and Londoners are taking advantage of this. According to data from Rightmove, the average asking price of a four-bed property in London is £983,000 compared to £659,000 in Surrey, the most expensive neighbouring county and £406,000 in Kent, the least expensive.
The increase in demand from both buyers moving out of London and those who are already living in the local market has resulted in all prime regions recording positive annual house price growth for the first time since September 2010.
In fact, over the first quarter of this year, the prime suburbs saw stronger house price growth than prime London with an average increase of 3.8% and 3.6% respectively, according to Savills prime market indices.
While this does appear to be the first signs of the ripple of strong house price growth moving from London to the regions, annual growth in the prime suburbs at 7.5% still stands some way below the 13.1% recorded in prime London.
Over the past two years we have already seen the ripple effect occur in London. Prime central London (PCL) led the recovery, outperforming all other prime regions until 2012 and average values are now a staggering 79% up on their 2009 trough.
"We have already seen the ripple effect occur in London"
Sophie Chick, Savills Research
However, the increase in stamp duty for properties over £2 million in March 2012, combined with increased activity in other parts of the market, meant that the ripple of strong house price growth moved out of PCL and into locations such as Fulham and Barnes, followed by Wandsworth and Islington.
These outer prime London markets have a greater concentration of UK buyers than the more central locations and have continued to see strong growth with average values increasing by 13.2% over the past year.
This is driven by a scarcity of stock coupled with multiple sources of demand: wealth being displaced out of central London; more household wealth being allocated to housing; and a reluctance to make the traditional move out of London, resulting in the recycling of wealth within the capital.
This final point was key in determining the fate of the prime regions. Following the credit crunch, demand for prime regional property, particularly in the countryside, did not return to the same extent as in London and buyers moving from the capital were noticeably absent.
Uncertainty around job security kept employees close to their desks and the lack of house price growth in the regions left London owners reluctant to trade in their London property.
One sub market which bucked this trend is that of the prime regional urban markets. Across the UK (excluding London) average values in prime cities and towns are now just 3.4% below their 2007 peak. By contrast, neighbouring village and rural locations are lagging behind, at -11.2% below peak.