Moving to a smaller home after the children have flown the nest probably sounds a very sensible idea for many people. Not only will they be living somewhere cheaper and more manageable to run, but they are also likely to be able to release wealth that could help to fund their later years or be passed to younger family members trying to get on the housing ladder.
Indeed, retirees and those approaching retirement (55 plus) have a great deal of equity tied up in their homes. Our analysis suggests that in total, two-thirds of all the wealth tied up in owner occupied homes is held by this age group.
Market constraints
According to the Survey of English Housing, there has historically been a surprising level of resistance to moving among older people, despite the fact that half of over-55s have a bigger home than they need. Those in their retirement years account for just 6.5% of all homemovers each year but just under 30% of non homemovers.
Across the market as a whole, downsizing tends to be triggered by a life event that highlights the need for a smaller home. Until then, elderly people may be deeply resistant to leaving the family home or the neighbourhood, according to a 2009 report by the Centre for Housing Studies.
Potential financial benefits are not a key driver, the report found, partly because across much of the country there’s not a great deal to be gained in monetary terms, taking into account the costs and sheer hassle of moving.
Our research backs that up. For instance, downsizing from a typical three-bed to a two-bed property would release more than £100,000 of equity in only one tenth of UK locations. So for most people in the mainstream housing market, downsizing is a matter of need rather than choice.
Typically they move from a threebed to a one-bedroom home in order to maximise the amount of cash they can release. On average, such a move frees up around £123,000 (though it’s worth noting that still, in almost half of UK locations, the money released amounts to less than £100,000).